COMMENTS

The margin of freedom of the state governments' action in the definition of the directions of the development is small and a little flexible, because the great instruments of politics economics are defined on a national scale. How to motivate the development without falling in the traps of the fiscal war, of the dilapidation of the public bens and of the natural resources? Alternatives for the difficult conditions lived through by diverse economical sections and for expressive continuations of society, they won't be found amongst themselves through systematic procedures of articulation among the different segments of the state and with the society, as well as through the identification, explanation and compatibility of the local, regional and sectarian interests.

The public organs have, indeed, created plans for their activities; especially those guided for the solution of sectarian subjects, as production of energy, sanitation, regularization of flows, transport, etc. Those plans that allowed the Brazilian state to create conditions support infrastructures for the politics devolvement were, and of substitution of imports, etc.

The choices are accomplished of form technocratic, between the technicians and sectarian economical continuations, taking to plans, whose horizon is not going besides problems punctual, sectarian historically dated. That procedure repeated, as rule, in all of government's levels, in all the action scales. On the other hand, the option for statements plans doesn't structure, including and integrated demands a discussion process and of searches of social consensus of such order that there was not, until there is little time, institutional mechanisms that of that support to that procedure " type. (Stela Goldenstein)